RANJITHA NITHYANANDA VIDEO WALLPAPER
Wherefrom then the events appear? Instead on the absence of an audio track on the file received from Life Bliss Foundation, and egregious speculation on a minor flickering effect. All of which are detailed in their reports. The Nithyananda representative in the video goes on to ask him whether there were any signs of alteration or tampering in the video he examined. Primeau could not have had access to the original tape Mr. Primeau then goes on to contradict the entire basis of his analysis when he says: Primeau, seemingly not a competent forensic investigator First, he declares that he has obtained the video from Life Bliss Foundation.
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
He was also a hero to Hindus in the late 80s, as he played a key role in the retrieval from London of the ancient idol stolen from the Aril Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Temple, setting an important precedent for restoration of Indian treasures.
Did a US expert say the Nithyananda – Ranjitha sleaze sex video was morphed?
What does that tell you about Nithyananda and the Ranjitha tape? Just for clarification, Dr P Chandra Sekharan is saying that the copies cannot be called original or genuine, but it does not mean that the original is morphed because of this obvious fact. Leave a reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
The answer from Mr. Latest NewsVideo Morphing 0. Chandrasekharan was appalled by Mr.
However, once taken on, to then assess the video as contentious, simply because the copy he received did not have audio, would indicate he was not impartial in his resulting poor assessment. A professional making such an argument would immediately call his vieo for forensic video analysis into question. In his video, on YouTube, he makes the following statement thus showing that any comments he has allegedly made regarding the video must be completely without foundation:.
Primeau, seemingly not a competent forensic ranjita. This is the video that has been admitted into court. The Nithyananda representative in the video goes on to ask him whether there were any signs of alteration or tampering in the video he examined.
Primeau indicated the possible red flags were: Both Swami Nithyananda and actress Ranjitha had vehemently denied that they were part of the video. Primeau ethically make any valid assessment of the file he received from Life Bliss Foundation as to whether the original video that he has no access to, nothyananda any tampering?
Did a foreign expert say the original nithyananda video was morphed? No.
Considering these points, it is clear why it is so suspicious that Nithyananda keeps delaying the trial please follow the public court records, rather than media or the nithyananda news site. Primeau, seemingly not a competent forensic investigator First, he declares that he has obtained the video from Life Bliss Foundation. Instead, he and his team of expensive criminal lawyers headed by CV Nagesh find every opportunity to try to quash the cases and bully whistleblowers… for 8 torturous years and counting.
The only way to determine if that [tampering of the video to create events that did not occur] is true or not, is to have access to and be able to examine the original, the equipment that created the original as well as the original digital file.
As many ex-devotees and Hindus have discovered, even a casual viewing of the whole tape and its aftermath forever removes any doubt about its authenticity. Primeau then goes on to contradict the entire basis of his analysis when he says: Primeau and his self-contradicting statements.
This doubt was cleared up after going through his resume which clearly shows his experience is significantly tilted towards audio analysis. Primeau claims that to properly verify any piece of media, he must have access to the original equipment, original file, formats etc.
Both CFSL and Penrod Ellis report available online have certified that the original video is unaltered, as they are the only ones who had access to the original equipment, medium, file formats and authors. Instead on the absence of an audio track on the file received from Life Bliss Foundation, and egregious speculation on a minor flickering effect.
Primeau is analyzing a video that has come from an entity with a vested interest in proving the video fake, and who are also experienced in video editing. The controversial footage showing the two in a compromising position…Soon after the video got leaked, Swami Nithyananda was absconding and five days later he appeared before the judicial magistrate court…He spent 53 days in jail before he was released on bail….
He passed judgment without evidence and stated a mere conjecture: Your email address will not be published. As early as Dec 2,Dr. Primeau to provide his assessment. Well, I have great news for those wanting the truth. No forensic analysis was actually necessary.